<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ways the New Digg Profiles Affect the Top 100 Digg Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/</link>
	<description>The Graphic Design and Web Design Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Digg a spam magnet? &#171; Green Tea Ice Cream</title>
		<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>New Digg a spam magnet? &#171; Green Tea Ice Cream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>[...] of policing if they&#8217;re not going to erode confidence in Digg any further.Kevin Rose claims in a comment on DesignVitality that the new design and community features will actually reduce the capacity of &#8216;power [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of policing if they&#8217;re not going to erode confidence in Digg any further.Kevin Rose claims in a comment on DesignVitality that the new design and community features will actually reduce the capacity of &#8216;power [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartFolio</title>
		<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartFolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>I agree, well said. Very good website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, well said. Very good website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nigelbriganti</title>
		<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>nigelbriganti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>not really sure if i care about the "top 100".. but i do love digg as a site.. i think its the content that is king and not who posts it.. anyway they are just coping someone elses headlines 90% of the time.. no big deal in my eyes.. i try to submit when i can but im not gonna sit in my browser all day ckecking my feeds to see if i can get a story up first..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not really sure if i care about the &#8220;top 100&#8243;.. but i do love digg as a site.. i think its the content that is king and not who posts it.. anyway they are just coping someone elses headlines 90% of the time.. no big deal in my eyes.. i try to submit when i can but im not gonna sit in my browser all day ckecking my feeds to see if i can get a story up first..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>SuxMonkey, it also makes it harder for people who only digg their friends to digg every single submission made by friends.  The diggs for diggs aspect of the site will be suppressed some.  The "top diggers" really only aggregate news from other sites like reddit and Stumble Upon or just plain old blogspam, so this should make the quality of content made popular better.  The 'top diggers' are not as important as they like to think they are.  A lot of them are spammers who know how to play the 'game'.  Game Over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SuxMonkey, it also makes it harder for people who only digg their friends to digg every single submission made by friends.  The diggs for diggs aspect of the site will be suppressed some.  The &#8220;top diggers&#8221; really only aggregate news from other sites like reddit and Stumble Upon or just plain old blogspam, so this should make the quality of content made popular better.  The &#8216;top diggers&#8217; are not as important as they like to think they are.  A lot of them are spammers who know how to play the &#8216;game&#8217;.  Game Over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mustafa</title>
		<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Mustafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>That is definitely something to be considered Suxmonkey, but I am sure we can all understand why Digg would like more time spent on the site. That means more page views for Digg to sell to advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is definitely something to be considered Suxmonkey, but I am sure we can all understand why Digg would like more time spent on the site. That means more page views for Digg to sell to advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suxmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Suxmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designvitality.com/blog/2007/09/5-ways-digg-change-affect-digg-top-100-user/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention: other changers suck for top Diggers. Now only headlines show up instead of full stories, so it takes extra time to go in, read the description, click the link to the story and so on. And what if you see a headline you can't remember having seen (or not) before? Well, you have to click the link of course to find out. This means a lot more time spend on site, which Digg likes, and is a pain for those of us who actually enjoyed the previously user-friendly experience of being a top Digger. Bleh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention: other changers suck for top Diggers. Now only headlines show up instead of full stories, so it takes extra time to go in, read the description, click the link to the story and so on. And what if you see a headline you can&#8217;t remember having seen (or not) before? Well, you have to click the link of course to find out. This means a lot more time spend on site, which Digg likes, and is a pain for those of us who actually enjoyed the previously user-friendly experience of being a top Digger. Bleh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
